Technology Solutions
Connect your systems so data moves reliably, and failures are visible rather than silent.

03 / Technology Solutions6 capabilities · 7 deliverables
The problem
Connecting two systems looks easy when the documentation shows a single successful request. In production, tokens expire, rate limits trigger, a vendor has a two-hour outage, and a webhook is delivered twice or out of order. If the integration was written for the happy path, you get duplicate invoices, orders that never reach the warehouse, or a CRM that quietly drifts out of step with billing.
These failures are hard to catch because they are partial. Most records sync, a few do not, and nobody is told. Months later, finance finds a discrepancy and no one can say which system is right or when the divergence began. Reliable integration is less about calling an endpoint and more about deciding what happens when the call goes wrong.
Sound familiar?
Our solution
We begin by agreeing which system is the source of truth for each piece of data, what direction it flows and how fresh it needs to be. Authentication uses the right scheme for each API, whether OAuth 2.0 with refresh handling, API keys held in a secrets manager or signed requests. Calls are wrapped with timeouts, retries using exponential backoff, and respect for rate limits.
Operations that change data carry idempotency keys, so a retry cannot create a second invoice. Incoming webhooks are verified by signature, acknowledged quickly, queued and processed in a way that tolerates duplicates and out-of-order delivery. Every run is logged, failures land in a dead-letter queue with an alert, and a reconciliation job compares both systems on a schedule. If a connector already exists and is reliable, we will configure that rather than write new code.
Capabilities
OAuth 2.0 flows with token refresh, API keys and signed requests handled securely, with credentials stored in a secrets manager and never in code.
Timeouts, exponential backoff with jitter and queue-based throttling so a temporary outage or a rate limit does not lose data.
Idempotency keys and unique-constraint checks make repeated requests safe, which stops double charges, duplicate orders and repeated emails.
Signature verification, fast acknowledgement, queued processing and handling of duplicate or out-of-order events from providers such as Stripe, Shopify or WhatsApp Business.
Field mapping, unit and format conversion, and handling of the differences between systems, such as statuses, tax fields and customer identifiers.
Structured logs, failure alerts, a dead-letter queue and scheduled comparisons between systems so drift is found in hours, not at month-end.
Process
We list the systems, the data that moves between them, the direction and timing, and which system wins when they disagree.
We read the vendors' documentation, check limits and failure behaviour, and write down the payloads and error cases the integration must handle.
We build against sandboxes, then deliberately test failures: expired tokens, duplicate webhooks, timeouts and malformed data.
Gradual rollout with alerts on, an initial reconciliation to confirm both sides match, and a runbook explaining what to do when something fails.
You receive
Where it fits best
FAQ
For low-volume, low-risk connections they are often the right choice and we will say so. When you need strict ordering, high volume, signed webhooks, complex mapping or guarantees against duplicates, custom code or a more controlled setup is safer. We choose based on the failure cost, not on a preference.
An idempotent operation produces the same result however many times it runs. Networks fail and clients retry, so without it a retried payment request can charge a customer twice. We attach a unique key to each change so the receiving system can recognise and ignore repeats.
Outages are handled by queuing and retrying, so data is delayed rather than lost. For API changes we pin to versioned endpoints where they exist, monitor for deprecation notices, and keep the integration code isolated so an update touches one place. Ongoing monitoring can be part of a support arrangement.
Sometimes. Options include file exports, database access, or an official partner interface. Screen-scraping is a last resort because it breaks easily, and we will explain the risk before agreeing to it.
Send a few lines about what you're trying to move. We'll reply with questions, a rough shape of the work, or an honest no.
Or write to hello@asoftbit.com